HealthPulse AnalysisSeptember 2026Rene Castillo

FY2027: why an outlier CAR-T case is paid less

The MS-DRG 018 base payment rose 6.1% for FY2027. The outlier threshold rose 22.2%. For a case expensive enough to clear the threshold in both years, the second change outweighs the first.

−$3,316 per case

For a CAR-T case whose cost clears the outlier threshold in both years, Medicare pays $3,316 less in FY2027 than in FY2026 at the same cost. That's at CMS's national illustrative rates, before any hospital-specific adjustment.

Change in Medicare payment, FY2026 to FY2027, for a CAR-T case above the outlier threshold in both yearsThe higher base payment adds $3,843. The higher outlier threshold takes away $7,159. The net change is minus $3,316 per case, at national illustrative rates with the same case cost.$0Base payment up 6.1%: +$3,843+$3,843Base paymentup 6.1%Outlier threshold up 22.2%: −$7,159−$7,159Outlier thresholdup 22.2%Net change per case: −$3,316−$3,316Net changeper case
Chart data
ComponentChange per case
Base payment up 6.1%+$3,843
Outlier threshold up 22.2%−$7,159
Net change per case−$3,316
How the two FY2027 changes net out for one case above the threshold. National illustrative rates, same estimated cost in both years.

The question

A forecast that carries the 6.1% base increase through its Medicare line misses the second change in the same rule. The published median total cost of an academic CAR-T case, $608,100, is well above the $333,445 FY2027 DRG payment, so for CAR-T the threshold matters as much as the base.

How the payment works

Medicare pays the DRG payment. When a case's estimated cost (its charges times the hospital's cost-to-charge ratio) exceeds the DRG payment plus the fixed-loss amount, Medicare adds an outlier payment of 80% of the excess. A higher DRG payment raises the base but also raises the bar the outlier payment starts from. For a case above the bar, only 20% of a base increase reaches the hospital. Every dollar added to the fixed-loss amount takes 80 cents off the outlier payment.

The calculation

InputFY2026FY2027CMS source
MS-DRG 018 relative weight43.182845.1272Table 5
Operating standardized amount (wage index 1.000 or less, quality data and meaningful EHR use)$6,752.61$6,848.98Table 1B, labor plus nonlabor
Capital federal rate$524.15$540.03Table 1D
DRG payment: weight x (operating + capital)$314,231$333,445Calculated
Fixed-loss outlier amount$40,397$49,346FY2027 final rule

The DRG payment rises by $19,214. The fixed-loss amount rises by $8,949. For a case above the threshold in both years, the change in total Medicare payment is 20% of the first minus 80% of the second: $3,843 minus $7,159, or −$3,316.

What it assumes

  • The same estimated cost in both years, above the outlier threshold in both.
  • Wage index and capital geographic adjustment factor of 1.000.
  • Quality data submitted and meaningful EHR use, so the full update applies.
  • No IME, DSH, uncompensated-care, new-technology add-on (NTAP), transfer or quality-program adjustments.
  • The standard 80% marginal cost factor.

What it doesn't show

  • A hospital's actual payment. Its wage index and add-on payments change both the DRG payment and where the threshold sits.
  • A margin or a loss. The cost here is Medicare's estimate from charges and the cost-to-charge ratio, not what the program spends.
  • Cases below the threshold. For those, FY2027 pays the full $19,214 more.
  • The eleven PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, which are paid under TEFRA cost-based rules with no outlier payment.
  • Commercial and Medicare Advantage payment, which follows contract terms, not this formula.

What it means for a program

The same rule moves CAR-T cases in opposite directions. A case below the threshold is paid $19,214 more in FY2027. A case above it in both years is paid $3,316 less. A forecast should split its Medicare cases by where they fall against the threshold before it applies the base-rate increase. Then it should check which of the remaining cases sit under commercial terms, single-case agreements or TEFRA, since none of those follow this arithmetic.

Sources

CMS, FY2027 IPPS final rule (CMS-1849-F), Federal Register document 2026-15833, Aug 4, 2026, and its Tables 1B, 1D and 5. CMS, FY2026 IPPS final rule, Tables 1B, 1D and 5. Median total cost of care: Di et al., JNCI Cancer Spectrum, Aug 2024. Calculation by HealthPulse Advisors.

Where do your cases fall against the threshold?

That split changes what a program's FY2027 Medicare forecast should assume. A short conversation is enough to find out whether it matters for yours.

Discuss a decision