FY2027: why an outlier CAR-T case is paid less
The MS-DRG 018 base payment rose 6.1% for FY2027. The outlier threshold rose 22.2%. For a case expensive enough to clear the threshold in both years, the second change outweighs the first.
−$3,316 per case
For a CAR-T case whose cost clears the outlier threshold in both years, Medicare pays $3,316 less in FY2027 than in FY2026 at the same cost. That's at CMS's national illustrative rates, before any hospital-specific adjustment.
Chart data
| Component | Change per case |
|---|---|
| Base payment up 6.1% | +$3,843 |
| Outlier threshold up 22.2% | −$7,159 |
| Net change per case | −$3,316 |
The question
A forecast that carries the 6.1% base increase through its Medicare line misses the second change in the same rule. The published median total cost of an academic CAR-T case, $608,100, is well above the $333,445 FY2027 DRG payment, so for CAR-T the threshold matters as much as the base.
How the payment works
Medicare pays the DRG payment. When a case's estimated cost (its charges times the hospital's cost-to-charge ratio) exceeds the DRG payment plus the fixed-loss amount, Medicare adds an outlier payment of 80% of the excess. A higher DRG payment raises the base but also raises the bar the outlier payment starts from. For a case above the bar, only 20% of a base increase reaches the hospital. Every dollar added to the fixed-loss amount takes 80 cents off the outlier payment.
The calculation
| Input | FY2026 | FY2027 | CMS source |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS-DRG 018 relative weight | 43.1828 | 45.1272 | Table 5 |
| Operating standardized amount (wage index 1.000 or less, quality data and meaningful EHR use) | $6,752.61 | $6,848.98 | Table 1B, labor plus nonlabor |
| Capital federal rate | $524.15 | $540.03 | Table 1D |
| DRG payment: weight x (operating + capital) | $314,231 | $333,445 | Calculated |
| Fixed-loss outlier amount | $40,397 | $49,346 | FY2027 final rule |
The DRG payment rises by $19,214. The fixed-loss amount rises by $8,949. For a case above the threshold in both years, the change in total Medicare payment is 20% of the first minus 80% of the second: $3,843 minus $7,159, or −$3,316.
What it assumes
- The same estimated cost in both years, above the outlier threshold in both.
- Wage index and capital geographic adjustment factor of 1.000.
- Quality data submitted and meaningful EHR use, so the full update applies.
- No IME, DSH, uncompensated-care, new-technology add-on (NTAP), transfer or quality-program adjustments.
- The standard 80% marginal cost factor.
What it doesn't show
- A hospital's actual payment. Its wage index and add-on payments change both the DRG payment and where the threshold sits.
- A margin or a loss. The cost here is Medicare's estimate from charges and the cost-to-charge ratio, not what the program spends.
- Cases below the threshold. For those, FY2027 pays the full $19,214 more.
- The eleven PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, which are paid under TEFRA cost-based rules with no outlier payment.
- Commercial and Medicare Advantage payment, which follows contract terms, not this formula.
What it means for a program
The same rule moves CAR-T cases in opposite directions. A case below the threshold is paid $19,214 more in FY2027. A case above it in both years is paid $3,316 less. A forecast should split its Medicare cases by where they fall against the threshold before it applies the base-rate increase. Then it should check which of the remaining cases sit under commercial terms, single-case agreements or TEFRA, since none of those follow this arithmetic.
Sources
CMS, FY2027 IPPS final rule (CMS-1849-F), Federal Register document 2026-15833, Aug 4, 2026, and its Tables 1B, 1D and 5. CMS, FY2026 IPPS final rule, Tables 1B, 1D and 5. Median total cost of care: Di et al., JNCI Cancer Spectrum, Aug 2024. Calculation by HealthPulse Advisors.
Where do your cases fall against the threshold?
That split changes what a program's FY2027 Medicare forecast should assume. A short conversation is enough to find out whether it matters for yours.
Discuss a decision